Leukemia· 2019Q1· Review
Targeting FLT3 mutations in AML: review of current knowledge and evidence
- 1,084citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2019year
Short summary
FLT3 mutations, particularly FLT3-ITD (in ~25% of AML cases), are common drivers associated with poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia, necessitating testing at diagnosis and relapse for targeted therapy.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- FLT3 mutations occur in ~30% of AML, with FLT3-ITD (~25%) being a poor prognostic marker.
- FLT3 mutational status evolves, underscoring the need for testing at diagnosis and relapse.
- Next-generation FLT3 inhibitors offer improved specificity and reduced toxicity compared to earlier agents.
- Resistance to FLT3 inhibitors is a challenge, prompting research into combination therapies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Genomic investigations of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have demonstrated that several genes are recurrently mutated, leading to new genomic classifications, predictive biomarkers, and new therapeutic targets. Mutations of the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene occur in approximately 30% of all AML cases, with the internal tandem duplication (ITD) representing the most common type of FLT3 mutation (FLT3-ITD; approximately 25% of all AML cases). FLT3-ITD is a common driver mutation that presents with a high leukemic burden and confers a poor prognosis in patients with AML. The prognostic value of a FLT3 mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain (FLT3-TKD), which has a lower incidence in AML (approximately 7-10% of all cases), is uncertain. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that FLT3 mutational status evolves throughout the disease continuum. This so-called clonal evolution, together with the identification of FLT3-ITD as a negative prognostic marker, serves to highlight the importance of FLT3-ITD testing at diagnosis and again at relapse. Earlier identification of FLT3 mutations will help provide a better understanding of the patient's disease and enable targeted treatment that may help patients achieve longer and more durable remissions. First-generation FLT3 inhibitors developed for clinical use are broad-spectrum, multikinase inhibitors; however, next-generation FLT3 inhibitors are more specific, more potent, and have fewer toxicities associated with off-target effects. Primary and secondary acquired resistance to FLT3 inhibitors remains a challenge and provides a rationale for combining FLT3 inhibitors with other therapies, both conventional and investigational. This review focuses on the pathological and prognostic role of FLT3 mutations in AML, clinical classification of the disease, recent progress with next-generation FLT3 inhibitors, and mechanisms of resistance to FLT3 inhibitors.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Leukemia, 2019 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Hematology
HematologyMedicine