Gut· 2014Q1· Review
Hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical frontiers and perspectives
- 1,422citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in cirrhosis patients is crucial due to defined early-stage diagnostic criteria and effective treatments, with approaches like resection and transplantation varying globally. Intermediate stages utilize ablation and embolization, while advanced stages are managed with sorafenib.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Surveillance imaging for cirrhosis patients is standard practice for early HCC detection.
- Diagnostic criteria for early-stage HCC (1-2 cm nodules) enable effective treatment.
- Treatment approaches for HCC, including resection and transplantation, differ globally.
- Intermediate HCC stages are treated with ablation and embolization techniques.
- Sorafenib remains the primary systemic therapy for advanced HCC.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death and is currently the main event leading to death in patients with cirrhosis. Evolving information suggests that the metabolic syndrome with non-alcoholic liver disease may be an important cause of HCC in addition to viral hepatitis and alcohol-induced liver disease. The molecular pathogenesis is extremely complex and heterogeneous. To date the molecular information has not impacted on treatment decisions. Periodic surveillance imaging of patients with cirrhosis is widely practiced, especially because diagnostic, radiographic criteria for early-stage HCC have been defined (including nodules between 1 and 2 cm) and effective treatment is available for tumours detected at an early stage. Worldwide the approach to resection versus transplantation varies depending upon local resources, expertise and donor availability. The criteria for transplantation are discussed, and the controversial areas highlighted with evidence-based recommendations provided. Several approaches are available for intermediate stage disease, including radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolisation and radioembolisation; the rationale for these therapies is buttressed by appropriate outcome-based studies. For advanced disease, systemic therapy with sorafenib remains the option best supported by current data. Thus, while several trials have failed to improve the benefits of established therapies, studies assessing the sequential or combined application of those already known to be beneficial are needed. Also, new concepts are provided in regards to selecting and stratifying patients for second-line studies, which may help explain the failure of prior studies.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Gut, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Hepatology
HepatologyMedicine