New England Journal of Medicine· 2020Q1· Clinical trial
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- 7,315citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2020year
Short summary
Combining atezolizumab and bevacizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma compared to sorafenib.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab reduced the hazard of death by 42% vs. sorafenib (HR 0.58, P<0.001).
- Median progression-free survival increased from 4.3 months with sorafenib to 6.8 months with atezolizumab-bevacizumab.
- 12-month overall survival was 67.2% for atezolizumab-bevacizumab vs. 54.6% for sorafenib.
- Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were comparable, with hypertension being the most frequent high-grade event in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group (15.2%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed encouraging antitumor activity and safety in a phase 1b trial involving patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In a global, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who had not previously received systemic treatment were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or sorafenib until unacceptable toxic effects occurred or there was a loss of clinical benefit. The coprimary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, as assessed at an independent review facility according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 336 patients in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group and 165 patients in the sorafenib group. At the time of the primary analysis (August 29, 2019), the hazard ratio for death with atezolizumab-bevacizumab as compared with sorafenib was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.79; P<0.001). Overall survival at 12 months was 67.2% (95% CI, 61.3 to 73.1) with atezolizumab-bevacizumab and 54.6% (95% CI, 45.2 to 64.0) with sorafenib. Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 8.3) and 4.3 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.6) in the respective groups (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.76; P<0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 56.5% of 329 patients who received at least one dose of atezolizumab-bevacizumab and in 55.1% of 156 patients who received at least one dose of sorafenib. Grade 3 or 4 hypertension occurred in 15.2% of patients in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group; however, other high-grade toxic effects were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab resulted in better overall and progression-free survival outcomes than sorafenib. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03434379.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2020 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Hepatology
HepatologyMedicine