PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2020Q1· Clinical trial

Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Richard S. Finn, Shukui Qin, Masafumi Ikeda, Peter R. Galle et al.

Short summary

Combining atezolizumab and bevacizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma compared to sorafenib.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab reduced the hazard of death by 42% vs. sorafenib (HR 0.58, P<0.001).
  • Median progression-free survival increased from 4.3 months with sorafenib to 6.8 months with atezolizumab-bevacizumab.
  • 12-month overall survival was 67.2% for atezolizumab-bevacizumab vs. 54.6% for sorafenib.
  • Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were comparable, with hypertension being the most frequent high-grade event in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group (15.2%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed encouraging antitumor activity and safety in a phase 1b trial involving patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In a global, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who had not previously received systemic treatment were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or sorafenib until unacceptable toxic effects occurred or there was a loss of clinical benefit. The coprimary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, as assessed at an independent review facility according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 336 patients in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group and 165 patients in the sorafenib group. At the time of the primary analysis (August 29, 2019), the hazard ratio for death with atezolizumab-bevacizumab as compared with sorafenib was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.79; P<0.001). Overall survival at 12 months was 67.2% (95% CI, 61.3 to 73.1) with atezolizumab-bevacizumab and 54.6% (95% CI, 45.2 to 64.0) with sorafenib. Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 8.3) and 4.3 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.6) in the respective groups (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.76; P<0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 56.5% of 329 patients who received at least one dose of atezolizumab-bevacizumab and in 55.1% of 156 patients who received at least one dose of sorafenib. Grade 3 or 4 hypertension occurred in 15.2% of patients in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group; however, other high-grade toxic effects were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab resulted in better overall and progression-free survival outcomes than sorafenib. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03434379.).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2020 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hepatology

HepatologyMedicine