PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Clinical Oncology· 2020Q1

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers: Long-Term Results of the SABR-COMET Phase II Randomized Trial

David A. Palma, Robert Olson, Stephen Harrow, Stewart Gaede et al.

Short summary

Adding stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to standard care significantly improved 5-year overall survival (42.3% vs 17.7%) and progression-free survival (17.3% vs 3.2%) in patients with 1-5 metastases, with no added toxicity or quality-of-life detriment.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Adding SABR to standard care improved 5-year overall survival from 17.7% to 42.3% (P=.006).
  • 5-year progression-free survival improved from 3.2% to 17.3% with SABR (P=.001).
  • The trial included 99 patients with 1-5 metastatic lesions across various primary cancer types.
  • No new grade 2-5 adverse events or differences in quality of life were observed between arms.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

PURPOSE The oligometastatic paradigm hypothesizes that patients with a limited number of metastases may achieve long-term disease control, or even cure, if all sites of disease can be ablated. However, long-term randomized data that test this paradigm are lacking. METHODS We enrolled patients with a controlled primary malignancy and 1-5 metastatic lesions, with all metastases amenable to stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). We stratified by the number of metastases (1-3 v 4-5) and randomized in a 1:2 ratio between palliative standard-of-care (SOC) treatments (arm 1) and SOC plus SABR (arm 2). We used a randomized phase II screening design with a primary end point of overall survival (OS), using an α of .20 (wherein P < .20 indicates a positive trial). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). Herein, we present long-term outcomes from the trial. RESULTS Between 2012 and 2016, 99 patients were randomly assigned at 10 centers internationally. The most common primary tumor types were breast (n = 18), lung (n = 18), colorectal (n = 18), and prostate (n = 16). Median follow-up was 51 months. The 5-year OS rate was 17.7% in arm 1 (95% CI, 6% to 34%) versus 42.3% in arm 2 (95% CI, 28% to 56%; stratified log-rank P = .006). The 5-year PFS rate was not reached in arm 1 (3.2%; 95% CI, 0% to 14% at 4 years with last patient censored) and 17.3% in arm 2 (95% CI, 8% to 30%; P = .001). There were no new grade 2-5 adverse events and no differences in QOL between arms. CONCLUSION With extended follow-up, the impact of SABR on OS was larger in magnitude than in the initial analysis and durable over time. There were no new safety signals, and SABR had no detrimental impact on QOL.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hepatology

HepatologyMedicine