New England Journal of Medicine· 2016Q1· Clinical trial
Randomized Trial of Introduction of Allergenic Foods in Breast-Fed Infants
- 880citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
Early introduction of six allergenic foods (peanut, egg, milk, sesame, fish, wheat) to breast-fed infants did not significantly reduce food allergy rates in an intention-to-treat analysis, but did show benefits in a per-protocol analysis.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Early introduction of six allergenic foods did not meet primary endpoint in intention-to-treat analysis (7.1% vs 5.6%).
- Per-protocol analysis showed significantly lower overall food allergy (2.4% vs 7.3%), peanut allergy (0% vs 2.5%), and egg allergy (1.4% vs 5.5%).
- Consumption of 2g/week of peanut or egg protein was associated with lower prevalence of respective allergies.
- Early introduction was safe but difficult to achieve consistently.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The age at which allergenic foods should be introduced into the diet of breast-fed infants is uncertain. We evaluated whether the early introduction of allergenic foods in the diet of breast-fed infants would protect against the development of food allergy. METHODS: We recruited, from the general population, 1303 exclusively breast-fed infants who were 3 months of age and randomly assigned them to the early introduction of six allergenic foods (peanut, cooked egg, cow's milk, sesame, whitefish, and wheat; early-introduction group) or to the current practice recommended in the United Kingdom of exclusive breast-feeding to approximately 6 months of age (standard-introduction group). The primary outcome was food allergy to one or more of the six foods between 1 year and 3 years of age. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, food allergy to one or more of the six intervention foods developed in 7.1% of the participants in the standard-introduction group (42 of 595 participants) and in 5.6% of those in the early-introduction group (32 of 567) (P=0.32). In the per-protocol analysis, the prevalence of any food allergy was significantly lower in the early-introduction group than in the standard-introduction group (2.4% vs. 7.3%, P=0.01), as was the prevalence of peanut allergy (0% vs. 2.5%, P=0.003) and egg allergy (1.4% vs. 5.5%, P=0.009); there were no significant effects with respect to milk, sesame, fish, or wheat. The consumption of 2 g per week of peanut or egg-white protein was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of these respective allergies than was less consumption. The early introduction of all six foods was not easily achieved but was safe. CONCLUSIONS: The trial did not show the efficacy of early introduction of allergenic foods in an intention-to-treat analysis. Further analysis raised the question of whether the prevention of food allergy by means of early introduction of multiple allergenic foods was dose-dependent. (Funded by the Food Standards Agency and others; EAT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN14254740.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Immunology and Allergy
Immunology and AllergyMedicine