New England Journal of Medicine· 2013Q1· Klinik çalışma
Semptomatik Venöz Tromboembolizm Tedavisinde Edoksabanın Warfarine Karşı Kullanımı
Edoxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism
- 1.869atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2013yıl
Kısa özet
Günde bir kez kullanılan oral faktör Xa inhibitörü edoksaban, venöz tromboembolizm tedavisinde warfarine göre etkinlikte geride kalmadı ve kanama olaylarını önemli ölçüde azalttı.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- Edoksaban, venöz tromboembolizm tedavisinde etkinlik açısından warfarine göre geride kalmadı (%3,2'ye karşılık %3,5 tekrarlama).
- Edoksaban, kanama açısından üstünlük göstererek anlamlı derecede daha az kanamaya neden oldu (%8,5'e karşılık %10,3).
- Pulmoner embolisi ve sağ ventrikül disfonksiyonu olan hastalarda, edoksaban warfarine kıyasla tekrarlayan VTE'de %48'lik bir azalma gösterdi.
- Çalışmaya derin ven trombozu veya pulmoner embolisi olan 8.000'den fazla hasta dahil edildi.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: Whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban can be an alternative to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism is unclear. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, we randomly assigned patients with acute venous thromboembolism, who had initially received heparin, to receive edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily, or 30 mg once daily (e.g., in the case of patients with creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute or a body weight below 60 kg), or to receive warfarin. Patients received the study drug for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4921 patients presented with deep-vein thrombosis, and 3319 with a pulmonary embolism. Among patients receiving warfarin, the time in the therapeutic range was 63.5%. Edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy outcome, which occurred in 130 patients in the edoxaban group (3.2%) and 146 patients in the warfarin group (3.5%) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.13; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The safety outcome occurred in 349 patients (8.5%) in the edoxaban group and 423 patients (10.3%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P=0.004 for superiority). The rates of other adverse events were similar in the two groups. A total of 938 patients with pulmonary embolism had right ventricular dysfunction, as assessed by measurement of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels; the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism in this subgroup was 3.3% in the edoxaban group and 6.2% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Edoxaban administered once daily after initial treatment with heparin was noninferior to high-quality standard therapy and caused significantly less bleeding in a broad spectrum of patients with venous thromboembolism, including those with severe pulmonary embolism. (Funded by Daiichi-Sankyo; Hokusai-VTE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00986154.).
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: İç Hastalıkları
Internal MedicineMedicine