PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Chemical Education· 2026Q2

University Students’ Preferred Models of Chemical Bonding

Iselin Grav Aakre, Per-Odd Eggen

Short summary

First-year chemistry students primarily prefer octet or Lewis structure models for covalent bonding, while second- and third-year students increasingly favor molecular orbital diagrams.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Student preference for chemical bonding models changes significantly between the first and second year of university.
  • First-year students predominantly favor octet or Lewis structure models for covalent bonding.
  • Second- and third-year students show a marked increase in preference for molecular orbital diagrams.
  • A student's preferred model is linked to their conceptual explanations and justifications of chemical bonding.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This paper shows how students’ preferred model of covalent bonding, exemplified by the hydrogen molecule, changes during their first two years of university studies. It analyzes some differences between first-year, second-year, and third-year students and between students who prefer different models. Chemistry students are introduced to several models and theories about chemical bonding and expected to integrate these models into a scientifically appropriate understanding of the topic, use them in constructive ways, and choose the most suitable model for the problem at hand. Research shows that students struggle with this and that even advanced students of chemistry tend to use simple models of chemical bonding, despite having learned more sophisticated models. This study analyzes first-year (N = 321), second-year (N = 221) and third-year (N = 199) chemistry students’ responses to a survey about students’ perceptions of chemical bonding and models of chemical bonding. Most first-year students chose either an octet model or a Lewis structure as their preferred model, while other models, such as a molecular orbital diagram, were popular among second- and third-year students. The study found a link between students’ preferred model and how students explain chemical bonding: Students who preferred different models used different concepts when describing chemical bonding and justified their choice of preferred model differently.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Chemical Education, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Physical and Theoretical ChemistryChemistry