PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Legislative Studies· 2026Q1

Reconnecting parliament and citizens: the conditions for institutionalising participation in Nigeria’s Tenth House of representatives

Jake Dan-Azumi

Short summary

Nigeria's Tenth House of Representatives has institutionalized participation on the input and visibility side (convening, broadcasting, access) but not on the feedback side, where citizen input rarely shapes outcomes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Nigeria's Tenth House of Representatives has improved parliamentary input and visibility but not feedback mechanisms.
  • Citizen input rarely shapes legislative outcomes despite efforts to increase participation.
  • Four conditions for institutionalizing participation are identified: leadership sponsorship, procedural linkage, feedback loops, and statutory anchoring.
  • Feedback loops and statutory anchoring are the most common points where reforms stall.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Legislatures worldwide face declining trust and rising demands for openness, yet more is known about whether reform matters than about the conditions under which it embeds rather than remaining symbolic. Through Nigeria's Tenth House of Representatives, which since 2023 has sought to reposition parliament as accessible and participatory, this article asks what distinguishes embedded participation from participation that merely performs openness. Using insider documentary analysis, it assesses four reform strategies, transparency and visibility, strategic communication, youth civic pipelines, and inclusive representation, against the Inter-Parliamentary Union's Indicators for Democratic Parliaments, triangulated against independent sources. The House has institutionalised participation on the input and visibility side, through convening, broadcasting and access, but not on the feedback side, where citizen input seldom shapes outcomes. From this asymmetry, it derives four conditions for institutionalisation, leadership sponsorship, procedural linkage, feedback loops, and statutory anchoring, and argues the last two are where reform most often stalls.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Legislative Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Gender Studies

Gender StudiesSocial Sciences