International Critical Thought· 2026Q1
American Imperialism in the Age of Trump
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Donald Trump's 'New Imperial Deal' strategy, aiming to rejuvenate the US economy and maintain global dominance through tariffs and burden-sharing demands on allies, ultimately failed due to internal contradictions and resistance from allies and emerging powers like China and Russia.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Trump's grand strategy, termed the 'New Imperial Deal,' used tariffs and ally burden-sharing to achieve economic and geopolitical goals.
- The strategy's zero-sum logic created internal contradictions, hindering its objectives.
- Resistance from allies and alternative configurations led by China, Russia, and BRICS challenged the US imperial project.
- These developments have accelerated US relative decline and opened space for multipolarity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Donald Trump came to power promising to rejuvenate the US economy and reconfigure global geopolitics to sustain the US-led unipolar order captured in his slogan, Make America Great Again. Economically, he has identified tariffs as a key instrument to punish countries perceived to have exploited US market openness. Geopolitically, his strategy has aimed to compel US allies to assume greater burdens while recalibrating relations with emerging powers, particularly China and Russia. This article provides a structural analysis of Trump’s grand strategy, conceptualized as a New Imperial Deal. It argues that the zero-sum logic underpinning this strategy generated internal contradictions, making its objectives largely unattainable. Resistance from allies alongside the emergence of alternative economic and geopolitical configurations led by China, Russia, and BRICS has challenged the foundations of the US imperial project. These developments have accelerated the relative decline of US international power and opened greater space for multipolarity. However, whether this space develops into a more durable multipolar order depends largely on the willingness of emerging and middle powers to overcome their divergent interests and develop forms of cooperation that can generate mutually beneficial outcomes.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Critical Thought, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences