BMC Medicine· 2026Q1
Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation for schizophrenia: a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled multicenter trial (STIM’Zo)
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) did not show superiority over sham treatment in reducing persistent schizophrenia symptoms at Day 5, with clinical response rates of 9.4% in the active group versus 13.2% in the sham group (n=132).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Clinical response at Day 5 was 9.4% with active tRNS vs. 13.2% with sham (p=0.56) in 132 schizophrenia patients.
- No significant differences were found in secondary symptom assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months.
- tRNS was found to be safe and well-tolerated, with no significant difference in serious adverse events between groups.
- The study did not demonstrate superiority of tRNS over sham treatment for persistent schizophrenia symptoms.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Persistent symptoms in schizophrenia remain a major therapeutic challenge. Noninvasive electrical stimulation such as transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) may alleviate auditory hallucinations and negative symptoms, although existing evidence is limited to case reports and pilot studies. In a triple blind sham-controlled study, we aimed to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of tRNS as an add-on treatment for persistent symptoms in schizophrenia.The primary outcome was clinical response at Day 5, defined as ≥ 25% reduction in PANSS total score. Secondary outcomes included symptom assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary analysis was performed in 132 patients (64 in the active group: 21 females/43 males; 68 in the sham group: 22 females/46 males). At Day 5, clinical response occurred in 6/64 (9.4%) patients in the active group and 9/68 (13.2%) in the sham group, with no significant difference between groups (-0.38, 95% CI [-1.64, 0.89], p = 0.56). No significant differences were found for secondary outcomes. Serious adverse events unrelated to treatment occurred in 5 (active) vs 7 (sham) patients (0.74, 95% CI [0.17, 2.88], p = 0.76). tRNS was safe and well tolerated but did not show superiority over sham in reducing persistent symptoms of schizophrenia. Trials.gov NCT02744989.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Neurology (Neuroscience)
NeurologyNeuroscience