New England Journal of Medicine· 2012Q1
Serum Kreatinin ve Sistatin C'den Glomerüler Filtrasyon Hızının Tahmini
Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C
- 4.077atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2012yıl
Kısa özet
Serum kreatinin ve sistatin C'yi birleştiren yeni bir denklem, tek başına bu belirteçleri kullanan denklemlere göre glomerüler filtrasyon hızını (GFR) daha doğru ve hassas bir şekilde tahmin ederek kronik böbrek hastalığı aşırı tanısını azaltabilir.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- Kreatinin-sistatin C birleşik denklemi, GFR tahmin hassasiyetini iyileştirdi (çeyrekler açıklığı 13.4'e karşı 15.4-16.4 ml/dak/1.73m²).
- Birleşik denklem, yanlış GFR tahminlerini (%30'dan fazla fark) %8.5'e düşürdü (önceki %12.8-14.1'e kıyasla).
- Tahmini GFR'si 45-74 ml/dak/1.73m² arasında olan katılımcılarda sınıflandırma doğruluğunu artırdı.
- Tahmini GFR'si 45-59 ml/dak/1.73m² olan bireylerin %16.9'unu GFR >= 60 ml/dak/1.73m² olarak doğru bir şekilde yeniden sınıflandırdı.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: Estimates of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that are based on serum creatinine are routinely used; however, they are imprecise, potentially leading to the overdiagnosis of chronic kidney disease. Cystatin C is an alternative filtration marker for estimating GFR. METHODS: Using cross-sectional analyses, we developed estimating equations based on cystatin C alone and in combination with creatinine in diverse populations totaling 5352 participants from 13 studies. These equations were then validated in 1119 participants from 5 different studies in which GFR had been measured. Cystatin and creatinine assays were traceable to primary reference materials. RESULTS: Mean measured GFRs were 68 and 70 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area in the development and validation data sets, respectively. In the validation data set, the creatinine-cystatin C equation performed better than equations that used creatinine or cystatin C alone. Bias was similar among the three equations, with a median difference between measured and estimated GFR of 3.9 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) with the combined equation, as compared with 3.7 and 3.4 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) with the creatinine equation and the cystatin C equation (P=0.07 and P=0.05), respectively. Precision was improved with the combined equation (interquartile range of the difference, 13.4 vs. 15.4 and 16.4 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2), respectively [P=0.001 and P<0.001]), and the results were more accurate (percentage of estimates that were >30% of measured GFR, 8.5 vs. 12.8 and 14.1, respectively [P<0.001 for both comparisons]). In participants whose estimated GFR based on creatinine was 45 to 74 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2), the combined equation improved the classification of measured GFR as either less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) or greater than or equal to 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) (net reclassification index, 19.4% [P<0.001]) and correctly reclassified 16.9% of those with an estimated GFR of 45 to 59 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) as having a GFR of 60 ml or higher per minute per 1.73 m(2). CONCLUSIONS: The combined creatinine-cystatin C equation performed better than equations based on either of these markers alone and may be useful as a confirmatory test for chronic kidney disease. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.).
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Nefroloji
NephrologyMedicine