PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2016Q1

Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Martin Reck, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Andrew Robinson, Rina Hui et al.

Short summary

Pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (10.3 vs. 6.0 months) and overall survival (80.2% at 6 months vs. 72.4%) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing PD-L1 on at least 50% of tumor cells, compared to chemotherapy.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Pembrolizumab extended median progression-free survival to 10.3 months vs. 6.0 months for chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive NSCLC (≥50% expression).
  • Overall survival at 6 months was higher with pembrolizumab (80.2%) than chemotherapy (72.4%).
  • Pembrolizumab achieved a higher objective response rate (44.8% vs. 27.8%) compared to chemotherapy.
  • Treatment-related adverse events were less frequent with pembrolizumab (73.4%) than chemotherapy (90.0%), with significantly fewer severe events (26.6% vs. 53.3%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death 1 (PD-1) that has antitumor activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with increased activity in tumors that express programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 305 patients who had previously untreated advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression on at least 50% of tumor cells and no sensitizing mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene or translocation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene to receive either pembrolizumab (at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy. Crossover from the chemotherapy group to the pembrolizumab group was permitted in the event of disease progression. The primary end point, progression-free survival, was assessed by means of blinded, independent, central radiologic review. Secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group versus 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.2) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.68; P<0.001). The estimated rate of overall survival at 6 months was 80.2% in the pembrolizumab group versus 72.4% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.89; P=0.005). The response rate was higher in the pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (44.8% vs. 27.8%), the median duration of response was longer (not reached [range, 1.9+ to 14.5+ months] vs. 6.3 months [range, 2.1+ to 12.6+]), and treatment-related adverse events of any grade were less frequent (occurring in 73.4% vs. 90.0% of patients), as were grade 3, 4, or 5 treatment-related adverse events (26.6% vs. 53.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression on at least 50% of tumor cells, pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer progression-free and overall survival and with fewer adverse events than was platinum-based chemotherapy. (Funded by Merck; KEYNOTE-024 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02142738 .).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2016 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Oncology

OncologyMedicine