PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2015Q1

Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma

James Larkin, Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni, René González, Jean‐Jacques Grob et al.

Short summary

Combining nivolumab (PD-1 inhibitor) and ipilimumab (CTLA-4 inhibitor) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in untreated metastatic melanoma patients compared to ipilimumab alone (11.5 vs. 2.9 months) and nivolumab alone (11.5 vs. 6.9 months). The combination was particularly effective in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab yielded a median progression-free survival of 11.5 months in untreated metastatic melanoma.
  • This combination significantly outperformed ipilimumab alone (2.9 months) and nivolumab alone (6.9 months).
  • The combination therapy was more effective than nivolumab alone in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors (11.2 months vs. 5.3 months).
  • Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55.0% of patients receiving the combination therapy.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab (a programmed death 1 [PD-1] checkpoint inhibitor) and ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA-4] checkpoint inhibitor) have been shown to have complementary activity in metastatic melanoma. In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, nivolumab alone or nivolumab plus ipilimumab was compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: We assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, 945 previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma to nivolumab alone, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or ipilimumab alone. Progression-free survival and overall survival were coprimary end points. Results regarding progression-free survival are presented here. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9 to 16.7) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, as compared with 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 3.4) with ipilimumab (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.42; 99.5% CI, 0.31 to 0.57; P<0.001), and 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 9.5) with nivolumab (hazard ratio for the comparison with ipilimumab, 0.57; 99.5% CI, 0.43 to 0.76; P<0.001). In patients with tumors positive for the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1), the median progression-free survival was 14.0 months in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and in the nivolumab group, but in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors, progression-free survival was longer with the combination therapy than with nivolumab alone (11.2 months [95% CI, 8.0 to not reached] vs. 5.3 months [95% CI, 2.8 to 7.1]). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 16.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group, 55.0% of those in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group, and 27.3% of those in the ipilimumab group. CONCLUSIONS: Among previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma, nivolumab alone or combined with ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than ipilimumab alone. In patients with PD-L1-negative tumors, the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade was more effective than either agent alone. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 067 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01844505.).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Oncology

OncologyMedicine