Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility· 2026Q1
High-resolution Manometry Catheter Insertion During Sedated Endoscopy; A Viable Option When Standard Intubation Fails
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Sedated endoscopic insertion of high-resolution manometry (HRM) catheters successfully completed testing in 91% of patients who failed routine insertion, yielding comparable diagnostic results.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Sedated endoscopic insertion (EI) of HRM catheters achieved successful protocol completion in 91% of patients.
- Patients undergoing EI were more likely to have failed prior routine insertion attempts (69% vs 10%).
- Manometric diagnoses from EI were comparable to those from routine insertion (RI).
- No adverse events were observed during the sedated endoscopic insertion procedure.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background/Aims: : When high-resolution manometry (HRM) intubation is not tolerated or the catheter fails to traverse the lower esophageal sphincter, the test is often abandoned, leaving patients without a diagnosis to guide therapy. Although endoscopic placement of HRM catheters under sedation has been described, no study has directly compared this approach with routine outpatient HRM. This study provides the first direct comparison of sedated endoscopic insertion (EI) versus routine insertion (RI). Methods: : All patients who underwent EI of the HRM catheter between January 2020 and May 2025 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with a contemporaneous cohort who had RI. Each test included the standard protocol of ten 5 mL water swallows followed by a 200 g rice meal. Demographic data, endoscopic technique, sedation levels and manometric diagnoses were evaluated. Esophageal body function was defined in accordance with the Chicago classification version 4.0. Results: = 0.008). No adverse events occurred. Conclusions: : Sedated EI of the HRM catheter enables protocol completion for patients unable to undergo routine testing, filling a key diagnostic gap while delivering manometric results comparable to standard, unsedated studies.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineMedicine