PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Australian Journal of Botany· 2026Q2

Polyploidy arises independently of hybrid status in clonal narrow-range endemic Callistemon from East Gippsland, Victoria

Mark D. Clifton, Bryce D. Watts-Parker, Susan E. Hoebee

Short summary

Polyploidy in East Gippsland Callistemon is not linked to hybridization; C. nyallingensis is an autotetraploid (2n=44) while its hybrid relatives and parental species are diploid (2n=22).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • C. forresterae and C. kenmorrisonii are diploids (2n=22) derived from hybridization between C. citrinus and C. subulatus.
  • C. nyallingensis is an autotetraploid (2n=44).
  • Chromosome number and DNA content (2C values) were positively correlated, validating flow cytometry for ploidy determination in Callistemon.
  • Hybridization is not a causal factor for polyploidy in this East Gippsland Callistemon complex.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Context Callistemon forresterae, C. kenmorrisonii and C. nyallingensis are a group of endangered and highly clonal narrow-range endemic species from East Gippsland, Victoria, Australia. All three taxa are suspected to reproduce apomictically. Recent genomic studies have demonstrated that C. forresterae and C. kenmorrisonii were independently derived following hybridisation between the more common species C. citrinus and C. subulatus, whereas C. nyallingensis was more closely allied to C. subulatus. Aims This study aims to assess whether polyploidy is associated with hybridisation in the group by confirming chromosome number and c-values in each taxon with comparison with parental species. Methods Ploidy was assessed using seed-raised progeny of known maternal genotypes. Root tip squashes were used to determine chromosome numbers, and flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content (2C values) was also used to infer ploidy. Key results The hybrids, C. forresterae and C. kenmorrisonii, as well as their parental species C. citrinus and C. subulatus, were confirmed to be diploid (2n = 22), whereas C. nyallingensis was found to be an autotetraploid (2n = 44). DNA content was significantly and positively correlated with observed chromosome numbers, confirming that, for Callistemon, flow cytometry can be used to determine ploidy. Conclusions Our results suggest that hybridisation is not a causal factor in the development of polyploidy in the East Gippsland Callistemon complex. Autopolyploidy remains the only form of polyploidy recorded in Callistemon. Implications If apomixis is confirmed in all taxa within the complex, then both hybridisation and polyploidy may facilitate its development. These findings have wider reaching implications, given the synonymisation of Callistemon with Melaleuca.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Australian Journal of Botany, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsAgricultural and Biological Sciences