The discursive construction of China in US institutional translation (1979–2025)
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
US institutional translation of Chinese texts, specifically the Interpret: China archive, constructs China through geopolitical competition and economic development frames, often preserving an affective register of grievance and threat, rather than through systematic divergence from source texts.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The Interpret: China archive constructs perceptions of China through institutional translation-as-curation, not just source-target divergence.
- China is primarily framed through geopolitical competition and economic development in the translated archive.
- An affective register of grievance, urgency, and threat management is frequently preserved in translations.
- The archive's framing influences how policy-facing publics understand China, particularly around Taiwan and military tensions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract This study examines how Interpret: China , a translation archive project hosted by the US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, shapes what counts as China for policy-facing publics while presenting its work as enabling “objective understanding.” Drawing on 335 parallel Chinese source texts and English translations spanning 1979 to 2025, the study argues that ideological meaning is produced less through systematic source–target divergence than through institutional translation-as-curation . Employing a corpus-based discourse-historical approach within the framework of critical discourse analysis, the study bridges linguistic and sociohistorical analysis to explore intersections of discourse, power, and ideology. The methodology integrates quantitative corpus analysis with qualitative discourse analysis, uncovering patterns across genres, topics, authors, sources, and tags. Findings show that the archive repeatedly renders China legible through geopolitical–security competition and economic development frames, with episodic spikes around Taiwan and military tensions. Concordance analysis reveals a recurring affective register of grievance, urgency, and threat management that is often preserved in faithful translations yet can be reoriented through institutional framing. The discourse-historical approach, combined with corpus methods, enables triangulation across diverse data sources and methods, offering an integrative framework for analyzing how translation archives participate in the cultural politics of geopolitical knowledge.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Babel Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Save the paper, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day in the app; takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Language and Linguistics
Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities