Solar RRL· 2026Q1
Impact of Data Temporal Resolution on the Energy Yield Modeling of Tandem Photovoltaic Devices
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Simulating tandem PV devices can be made up to 99% faster by downsampling meteorological input data, provided the resampling method conserves total solar insolation, maintaining annualized energy yield error below 0.2%.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Downsampling meteorological input data can reduce tandem PV device model evaluations by up to 99%.
- Conserving total solar insolation during resampling is crucial for maintaining accuracy, with errors below 0.2% for annualized energy yield.
- Non-conservative methods (slicing, median) result in unreliable energy yield estimates with errors over 5%.
- Modeling errors are driven by energy conservation and PV nonlinearity, with impacts varying by climate volatility and irradiance levels.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Full physics‐based equivalent circuit models for tandem photovoltaic (PV) devices provide high accuracy but are computationally intensive. This study investigates reducing simulation runtime by downsampling meteorological input data using three methods—mean, median, and slicing—across two distinct climates (Colorado and Oregon) on the energy yield modeling of tandem devices. These methods represent both post‐measurement downsampling (mean and median) and changes in field measurement frequency (slicing). We show that the number of device model evaluations may be reduced by up to 99% while maintaining an annualized energy yield estimate error of less than 0.2% if the resampling method conserves total solar insolation. Conversely, the nonconservative slicing and median methods produce unreliable results with errors exceeding 5% due to inherent energy nonconservation. We identify two primary drivers of modeling error: energy conservation and PV nonlinearity. While these underlying error mechanisms are climate agnostic, the resultant impact on energy yield estimates varies in different meteorological regimes. In high‐volatility environments, smoothing effects suppress subcell mismatch and nonlinear losses, leading to overestimation. In low‐irradiance conditions, efficiency losses dominate, shifting errors toward underestimation. The results of this work provide a framework for high‐speed tandem modeling that balances computational efficiency with site‐specific accuracy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Solar RRL, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentEnergy