Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education· 2026Q1
Cultural and linguistic resources as an asset-based language learning approach: translanguaging pedagogy for English learning at a Chinese university
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Translanguaging pedagogy in Chinese university English courses can leverage students' and instructors' non-English linguistic and cultural resources as assets, according to qualitative interview data.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Translanguaging pedagogy can utilize non-English linguistic and cultural resources as assets in English language learning.
- Qualitative interview data from a Chinese university explores instructor and student attitudes towards this approach.
- The study highlights the benefits of dynamic bilingualism in language education.
- It critiques prevailing monoglossic and imperialistic language ideologies in English language instruction.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The growth of international exchange and student mobility has heightened the need for high-quality instruction in higher education to maintain competitiveness in the global education landscape. In response to the internationalization of higher education, the Ministry of Education in China began promoting Chinese-English bilingual education to develop global citizens. While national and global trends demand competitive international scholars, leveraging teachers’ and learners’ linguistic and cultural resources while implementing translanguaging pedagogy in Asian countries remains underexplored. Using qualitative interview data, this study aims to investigate instructors’ and students’ attitudes and perceptions toward Chinese-English bilingual instruction enacted through translanguaging pedagogy in general English courses at a private Chinese university. Findings suggest how non-English language resources can be leveraged and capitalized as a form of asset-based translanguaging pedagogy. The findings of this study have implications for both research and practice regarding the benefits of dynamic bilingualism and non-English linguistic and cultural resources in promoting asset-based language learning. Prevailing monoglossic and imperialistic language ideologies in English-language instruction and research are also discussed.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Linguistics and Language
Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences