PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Modern Asian Studies· 2026Q1

Hybridity, glocalization, and the negotiation of contemporary Chineseness in guoman (national animation): White Snake: Afloat (2024)

Catherine L. Zhou

Short summary

White Snake: Afloat (2024) demonstrates hybridity in techno-artistic, narrative, and structural elements, reflecting a negotiation between state ideology, market demands, and animator agency within China's national animation (guoman) revival.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • White Snake: Afloat (2024) exhibits hybridity across its technical, narrative, and structural components.
  • This hybridity is a result of negotiations between state ideology, market demands, and animator agency.
  • The film's hybrid forms represent competing interpretations of contemporary Chineseness.
  • The analysis utilizes theories of hybridity, glocalization, and identity work to frame the guoman revival.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This article examines Light Chaser’s animation White Snake: Afloat (2024) within the context of the revival of Chinese guoman 國漫 (national animation) since the 2010s. It reflects on a key gap in existing literature: a failure to analyse the dynamic interplay of state ideology, market demands, and animators’ agency in the construction of specific guoman texts. Drawing on an interdisciplinary framework comprising Homi Bhabha’s ‘hybridity’, Roland Robertson’s ‘glocalization’, and Weiyu Zhang’s ‘Chineseness as identity work’, this article explores how the tripartite negotiation leads to distinct forms of hybridity across three aspects of the film—techno-artistic, narrative, and structural—against the backdrop of media glocalization. The analysis also examines how the film’s hybrid forms embody competing versions of Chineseness. The overall argument is that the hybridity in Afloat is a product of the triad’s complex negotiation; it illuminates the contentious status quo of contemporary Chineseness as a globalized ‘identity work’—a dynamic, ongoing, and contested process of constructing identity, encompassing not only a subject’s self-identification but also how others identify that subject.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Modern Asian Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Gender Studies

Gender StudiesSocial Sciences