PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Clinical & Experimental Allergy· 2026Q2· Review

Beyond Omalizumab: Emerging Biologic and Small Molecule Therapies in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Sahibpreet Kaur, Muthu Sendhil Kumaran, Saumya Singh, Davinder Parsad

Short summary

New biologic and small molecule therapies, targeting IgE-independent pathways like BTK, IL-4/IL-13, KIT, MRGPRX2, and JAK-STAT, are expanding treatment options for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) beyond H1-antihistamines and omalizumab.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • CSU treatment is expanding beyond H1-antihistamines and omalizumab due to IgE-independent mast cell activation pathways.
  • New targets include BTK, IL-4/IL-13, KIT, MRGPRX2, and JAK-STAT pathways.
  • Remibrutinib (BTK inhibitor) and Dupilumab (IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor) are approved for adults and children, respectively.
  • Several other agents are in Phase 3 trials, but ligelizumab failed to outperform omalizumab.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) remains inadequately controlled by H1-antihistamines and omalizumab in a substantial minority of patients at every age. Recognition that mast cell activation proceeds through IgE-independent as well as IgE-dependent routes has exposed several tractable targets-Bruton's tyrosine kinase, the IL-4/IL-13 axis, KIT, MRGPRX2 and the JAK-STAT pathway-hence the resulting expansion of the treatment armamentarium is the largest since omalizumab. The oral BTK inhibitor remibrutinib is now licensed for adults in the United States and European Union; Dupilumab, approved from 12 years of age in 2025, was extended to children aged 2-11 years in 2026 on basis of extrapolated efficacy supported by paediatric pharmacokinetic and safety data. Barzolvolimab has completed Phase 3 enrolment of 1939 adults, briquilimab, EVO756, EP262 and rilzabrutinib are advancing in adults and ligelizumab failed to demonstrate superiority over omalizumab. This review appraises these agents by mechanism, efficacy, safety and probable place in therapy and argues that the limiting factor is no longer the number of druggable targets but the distribution and quality of the evidence. Adults dominate the trial populations; adolescents are enrolled as underpowered subgroups; dedicated paediatric evidence is essentially confined to dupilumab; and older adults-in whom comorbidity, polypharmacy and the cardiovascular and malignancy signals of JAK inhibition matter most-are almost never analyzed separately. Head-to-head and sequencing trials, endotype-stratified patient selection, age-inclusive trial design and long-term safety data are the immediate priorities if mechanism-based treatment is to reach patients at every stage of life.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Rheumatology

RheumatologyMedicine