Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction· 2026Q2
From OSS to Open Source AI: an Exploratory Study of Collaborative Development Paradigm Divergence
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Open source AI models (OSM) exhibit significantly lower collaboration intensity and direct contribution openness compared to traditional open source software (OSS), shifting towards adaptive utilization user-innovation rather than collaborative improvement.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- OSM development shows significantly lower collaboration intensity than traditional OSS.
- Direct contribution openness is lower in OSM, but knowledge exchange remains relatively open.
- OSM development favors adaptive utilization user-innovation over collaborative improvement.
- Socio-technical factors underlie these divergences in open source AI development.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
AI development is embracing open-source paradigm, but the fundamental distinction between AI models and traditional software artifacts may lead to a divergent open-source development paradigm with different collaborative practices, which remains unexplored. We therefore bridge the knowledge gap by quantifying and characterizing the differences in the collaborative development paradigms of traditional open source software (OSS) and open source AI models (OSM), and investigating the underlying factors that may drive these distinctions. We collect 1,428,792 OSS repositories from GitHub and 1,440,527 OSM repositories from HF Hub, and conduct comprehensive statistical, social network and content analyses to measure and understand the differences in collaboration intensity, collaboration openness, and user innovation across the two development paradigms, complementing these quantitative results with semi-structured interviews. In consequence, we find that compared to OSS development paradigm, the OSM development paradigm exhibits significantly lower collaboration intensity; lower collaboration openness regarding direct contribution while persisting relatively open knowledge exchange; and a divergence toward adaptive utilization user-innovation rather than collaborative improvement. Through semi-structured interviews, we further elucidate the socio-technical factors underlying these differences. These findings reveal the paradigmatic divergence in open source development between traditional OSS and OSM across three critical dimensions of open source collaboration and potential underlying factors, shedding light on how to improve collaborative work techniques and practices within the context of AI development.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Computer Science Applications
Computer Science ApplicationsComputer Science