Journal of Internal Medicine· 2014Q1
Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution
- 1,674citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
The definition of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) has been widely adopted globally since 2003, but discrepancies in research findings stem from variations in applying its core, unchanged criteria across different settings and populations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The core criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) have remained unchanged since their 2003 definition.
- MCI is widely used globally in clinical and research settings to bridge normal cognition and dementia.
- Discrepancies in MCI research are largely due to differences in operationalizing criteria, study settings, subject selection, and follow-up periods.
- Key ongoing debates include algorithmic vs. clinical classification, reliability of clinical judgment, and the predictivity of biomarkers.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The construct of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has evolved over the past 10 years since the publication of the new MCI definition at the Key Symposium in 2003, but the core criteria have remained unchanged. The construct has been extensively used worldwide, both in clinical and in research settings, to define the grey area between intact cognitive functioning and clinical dementia. A rich set of data regarding occurrence, risk factors and progression of MCI has been generated. Discrepancies between studies can be mostly explained by differences in the operationalization of the criteria, differences in the setting where the criteria have been applied, selection of subjects and length of follow-up in longitudinal studies. Major controversial issues that remain to be further explored are algorithmic versus clinical classification, reliability of clinical judgment, temporal changes in cognitive performances and predictivity of putative biomarkers. Some suggestions to further develop the MCI construct include the tailoring of the clinical criteria to specific populations and to specific contexts. The addition of biomarkers to the clinical phenotypes is promising but requires deeper investigation. Translation of findings from the specialty clinic to the population setting, although challenging, will enhance uniformity of outcomes. More longitudinal population-based studies on cognitive ageing and MCI need to be performed to clarify all these issues.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Internal Medicine, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Psychiatry and Mental health
Psychiatry and Mental healthMedicine