PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Applied Linguistics Review· 2026Q1· Review

Mapping translanguaging research in global Chinese language education: a systematic review

Xinyue Lu, Zhongfeng Tian, Danping Wang

Short summary

A systematic review of 52 studies (2014-2024) reveals translanguaging in Chinese language education is a rapidly growing but geographically concentrated field, primarily in North American dual-language programs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 52 empirical studies on translanguaging in Chinese language education published between 2014-2024 were systematically reviewed.
  • The field is rapidly growing but geographically concentrated, with North American dual-language programs dominating research contexts.
  • Translanguaging is often implemented covertly or functionally, despite strong theoretical framings in many studies.
  • Key challenges include ideological resistance, structural constraints, and tensions with Confucian heritage pedagogies.
  • One-third of studies engage critically with decolonial or anti-racist aims.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Over the past decade, translanguaging has emerged as a significant framework in language education, yet its application in Chinese language teaching remains underexplored. This systematic review examines 52 empirical studies published between 2014 and 2024 to map how translanguaging has been conceptualized and enacted in global Chinese language education. Viewing translanguaging through a dual framing as both a practice and a stance , we investigated research contexts, reported affordances and challenges, and engagement with social justice, and mapped the studies along two continua: from spontaneous to pedagogical practice and from weaker to stronger stance. Findings reveal a rapidly growing but geographically concentrated field, dominated by North American dual-language bilingual programs. While many studies adopt strong theoretical framings, implementation often remains covert, emergent, or functionally oriented. Translanguaging demonstrates unique affordances for Chinese literacy development and potential for disrupting Mandarin hegemony, yet faces persistent ideological resistance, structural constraints, and tensions with Confucian heritage pedagogies. Additionally, one-third of studies demonstrate critical engagement with decolonial or anti-racist aims. We call for future research in underrepresented contexts beyond North America, greater attention to ideological and cultural tensions shaping implementation, and designs that move beyond recognition and inclusion to leverage translanguaging’s transformative potential in Chinese language education.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Applied Linguistics Review, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences