PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Oral Health· 2026Q1

Comparative finite element analysis of material–cement combinations in a fixed pediatric space maintainer

Münevver Çağla Aslan, Ömer Faruk Güdük, Kutay Çava, Altuğ Uşun

Short summary

PEEK and composite resin space maintainers bonded with resin cement showed higher stress in the cement layer compared to other material-cement combinations, with RMGIC generally yielding lower peak cement stress than GIC.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • PEEK and composite resin space maintainers, having lower elastic moduli, resulted in higher stress within the cement layer.
  • Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) was associated with lower peak cement-layer stress compared to glass ionomer cement (GIC).
  • Material stiffness and cement type were found to be significant factors influencing stress distribution patterns in fixed space maintainers.
  • The study modeled premature loss of a mandibular second primary molar, using the permanent first molar as an abutment.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of fixed space maintainers fabricated from different materials and bonded with various dental cements using three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). A three-dimensional finite element model representing premature loss of the mandibular second primary molar was constructed. The mandibular permanent first molar served as the abutment tooth, while the loop extended mesially toward the adjacent mandibular first primary molar. Space maintainers fabricated from composite resin, PEEK, titanium, and stainless steel were evaluated in ten material–cement combinations using glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and resin cement. Resin cement was paired only with composite resin and PEEK, whereas titanium and stainless-steel maintainers were evaluated with GIC and RMGIC. A 150 N multi-point occlusal load was applied to simulate physiological masticatory forces, and stress distribution was evaluated using von Mises criteria. The results demonstrated that material stiffness and cement type markedly influenced stress distribution patterns. PEEK and composite maintainers with lower elastic moduli exhibited higher cement-layer stress values. Among comparable cement conditions, RMGIC was associated with lower peak cement-layer stress values than GIC. Within the limitations of this computational model, material–cement compatibility influenced stress distribution within the fixed space maintainer system. These findings provide biomechanical insight into the behavior of different material–cement combinations; however, further in vitro and long-term clinical studies are required before definitive clinical recommendations can be made.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Oral Health, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Orthodontics

OrthodonticsDentistry