PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology· 2026Q1

Design and functional verification of an automated Perkins Brailler accessory with audio feedback

Ibrahim Mahariq, İbrahim Arpacı, Ahmad Alazmi, Omer Gibreel et al.

Short summary

A proof-of-concept automated accessory actuates Perkins Brailler keys using solenoids and provides audio feedback for text input.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • An automated accessory prototype actuates Perkins Brailler keys using push-type electromagnetic solenoids.
  • A gear motor assists with carriage return functionality.
  • A computer interface provides text input with audio feedback corresponding to Braille output.
  • Initial bench testing confirmed functional feasibility for three specific alphabetic inputs (B, C, D).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study presents a proof-of-concept automated accessory designed to actuate selected functions of a standard Perkins Brailler. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prototype uses push-type electromagnetic solenoids to operate the Brailler keys, a gear motor to support carriage return, and a computer-based interface that provides alphabetic text input with audio feedback. The work is framed as a preliminary hardware-and-software platform for exploring low-cost automation of Perkins Brailler operation, rather than as a validated assistive technology for learners with visual impairments. The engineering contribution is demonstrated through the high-level and low-level designs, the three-dimensional housing structure, the character-to-actuation mapping, and the functional implementation of the prototype. Initial bench testing was conducted by the researchers under controlled conditions using three alphabetic inputs, B, C, and D, with 10 repeated trials for each input. RESULTS: Across these trials, the entered characters were converted into the intended Braille cell outputs, and the corresponding audio feedback was produced as expected. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not include learners with visual impairment, Braille teachers, rehabilitation specialists, or other end users, and it did not collect quantitative measures of accuracy across the full character set, writing speed, embossing quality, latency, durability, safety, usability, or user satisfaction. The findings should therefore be read as preliminary evidence of functional feasibility and as a basis for future technical refinement, full character-set testing, safety assessment, and user-centered evaluation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Occupational Therapy

Occupational TherapyHealth Professions