PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Future Transportation· 2026Q2

GPU-Accelerated Guided Heuristic Sampling for Residual Error Probability Analysis in CAN FD Communication

Krisztián Koller, Balázs Baráth

Short summary

A GPU-accelerated framework using OpenCL dramatically increases residual error probability analysis speed for CAN FD (from 150K to 4.2M iterations/sec), revealing that CRC protection can be bypassed by specific multi-bit corruption patterns, though application-layer E2E protection proved robust in tested configurations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • GPU acceleration via OpenCL boosts CAN FD error analysis speed to 4.2 million iterations/sec.
  • Standard CRC protection can be bypassed by specific multi-bit corruption patterns, including stuff-bit cascading.
  • Application-layer E2E protected configurations showed no residual errors in the evaluated scenarios.
  • Localized payload regions (Bytes 12-16) are susceptible to masking failures, particularly for radar data.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The deployment of automated driving features demands stringent compliance with ISO 26262, particularly concerning data integrity over in-vehicle networks. This study effectively addresses the computational challenges of quantifying the residual error probability of Classical CAN and CAN FD communication under high-order fault profiles. By introducing a GPU-accelerated residual error analysis framework utilizing OpenCL, it overcomes the mathematical barriers of traditional brute-force simulation, elevating execution speeds from 150,000 to 4.2 million iterations per second. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that native data-link layer CRC protection may be bypassed under specific multi-bit physical-layer corruption patterns involving stuff-bit cascading effects. Conversely, for the evaluated application-layer End-to-End (E2E) protected configurations, no residual errors were observed. However, from a functional safety management perspective, these observations must be interpreted within the scope of the investigated configurations: the localized payload regions between Bytes 12 and 16 exhibiting an elevated susceptibility to masking failures apply exclusively to the investigated radar payload structures and selected real-world BLF traces. Because these masking failures are highly dependent on the evaluated frame structures and specific fault-injection scenarios, the conclusions should be limited accordingly to the evaluated configurations.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Future Transportation, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hardware and Architecture

Hardware and ArchitectureComputer Science