New England Journal of Medicine· 2016Q1· Review
Zika Virus and Birth Defects — Reviewing the Evidence for Causality
- 2,042citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
A causal relationship is established between prenatal Zika virus infection and microcephaly and other serious brain anomalies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Prenatal Zika virus infection is causally linked to microcephaly and severe brain anomalies.
- Evidence includes consistent timing of infection, a specific phenotype, and virus detection in affected fetal brains.
- The established causal relationship highlights the urgent need for prevention strategies.
- Further research is required to define the full spectrum of defects and risk factors.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Summary The Zika virus has spread rapidly in the Americas since its first identification in Brazil in early 2015. Prenatal Zika virus infection has been linked to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, most notably microcephaly and other serious brain anomalies. To determine whether Zika virus infection during pregnancy causes these adverse outcomes, we evaluated available data using criteria that have been proposed for the assessment of potential teratogens. On the basis of this review, we conclude that a causal relationship exists between prenatal Zika virus infection and microcephaly and other serious brain anomalies. Evidence that was used to support this causal relationship included Zika virus infection at times during prenatal development that were consistent with the defects observed; a specific, rare phenotype involving microcephaly and associated brain anomalies in fetuses or infants with presumed or confirmed congenital Zika virus infection; and data that strongly support biologic plausibility, including the identification of Zika virus in the brain tissue of affected fetuses and infants. Given the recognition of this causal relationship, we need to intensify our efforts toward the prevention of adverse outcomes caused by congenital Zika virus infection. However, many questions that are critical to our prevention efforts remain, including the spectrum of defects caused by prenatal Zika virus infection, the degree of relative and absolute risks of adverse outcomes among fetuses whose mothers were infected at different times during pregnancy, and factors that might affect a woman’s risk of adverse pregnancy or birth outcomes. Addressing these questions will improve our ability to reduce the burden of the effects of Zika virus infection during pregnancy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthMedicine