PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2015Q1

Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Marcelo B. P. Amato, Maureen O. Meade, Arthur S. Slutsky, Laurent Brochard et al.

Short summary

Driving pressure (ΔP), a measure of lung strain normalized to functional lung size, was the strongest predictor of survival in ARDS patients, with a 1-SD increase associated with 41% higher mortality (n=3562).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Driving pressure (ΔP) was the strongest predictor of survival in ARDS patients (n=3562).
  • A 1-SD increase in ΔP (approx. 7 cm H2O) was associated with a 41% increase in mortality (RR 1.41, P<0.001).
  • ΔP predicted mortality even in patients receiving protective plateau pressures and tidal volumes (RR 1.36, P<0.001).
  • Individual changes in tidal volume or PEEP were not independently associated with survival; their benefit was mediated by reductions in ΔP.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mechanical-ventilation strategies that use lower end-inspiratory (plateau) airway pressures, lower tidal volumes (VT), and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) can improve survival in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the relative importance of each of these components is uncertain. Because respiratory-system compliance (CRS) is strongly related to the volume of aerated remaining functional lung during disease (termed functional lung size), we hypothesized that driving pressure (ΔP=VT/CRS), in which VT is intrinsically normalized to functional lung size (instead of predicted lung size in healthy persons), would be an index more strongly associated with survival than VT or PEEP in patients who are not actively breathing. METHODS: Using a statistical tool known as multilevel mediation analysis to analyze individual data from 3562 patients with ARDS enrolled in nine previously reported randomized trials, we examined ΔP as an independent variable associated with survival. In the mediation analysis, we estimated the isolated effects of changes in ΔP resulting from randomized ventilator settings while minimizing confounding due to the baseline severity of lung disease. RESULTS: Among ventilation variables, ΔP was most strongly associated with survival. A 1-SD increment in ΔP (approximately 7 cm of water) was associated with increased mortality (relative risk, 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31 to 1.51; P<0.001), even in patients receiving "protective" plateau pressures and VT (relative risk, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.58; P<0.001). Individual changes in VT or PEEP after randomization were not independently associated with survival; they were associated only if they were among the changes that led to reductions in ΔP (mediation effects of ΔP, P=0.004 and P=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that ΔP was the ventilation variable that best stratified risk. Decreases in ΔP owing to changes in ventilator settings were strongly associated with increased survival. (Funded by Fundação de Amparo e Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and others.).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineMedicine