PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journalism· 2026Q1

Feeling the crisis, building the alternative: Women journalists in nonprofit digital media through the lens of feminist epistemology and the affective turn

Majda Hrženjak

Short summary

Women journalists co-founding nonprofit digital media outlets enact agentic responses to deteriorating legacy media conditions, leveraging affective labor (passion, care, anger) to create alternative spaces and reimagine journalistic ethics and autonomy.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Women journalists are co-founding nonprofit digital media outlets as a response to deteriorating conditions in legacy media.
  • These initiatives are framed through feminist standpoint epistemology and the affective turn, viewing journalism as affective labor.
  • Emotions such as anger, care, and responsibility, combined with digital tools, enable the creation of these alternative media spaces.
  • The outlets are seen as micropolitical and epistemological interventions reclaiming professional autonomy and integrity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article draws on feminist standpoint epistemology and the affective turn to examine how women journalists respond to deteriorating working conditions in Slovenian legacy media. The study focuses on three analytically selected cases of women journalists who co-founded nonprofit, women-led digital media outlets, drawn from 15 exploratory autobiographical interviews. Their narratives articulate experiences of marginalization alongside agentic responses that critically interrogate developments in the legacy media system and call for a rethinking of journalistic ethics and labor organization. Journalism is approached as affective labor, marked by the entanglement of passion, self-exploitation, and precarity, in which emotions such as anger, care, and responsibility – combined with digital affordances – enable the creation of alternative media spaces. These initiatives are interpreted not merely as individual survival strategies but as micropolitical and epistemological interventions that reclaim professional autonomy and integrity. While embedded in neoliberal conditions and structurally fragile, they demonstrate the potential of alternative practices to reimagine journalism from the margins.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journalism, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Communication

CommunicationSocial Sciences