Scientific Reports· 2026Q1
Machine learning modelling of a nonlinear environmental index with sensitivity analysis for groundwater assessment
- 31citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model achieved near-perfect accuracy (R²=0.999, RMSE=1.02) in predicting the Groundwater Quality Index (GWQI) for the Marvdasht aquifer, outperforming SVM and RF models.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- An ANN model achieved R²=0.999 and RMSE=1.02 in predicting the Groundwater Quality Index (GWQI), outperforming SVM and RF.
- TDS, EC, Na⁺, Cl⁻, and Mg²⁺ were identified as the most influential groundwater quality parameters.
- TDS (mean variation index 27.8) and EC (mean variation index 15.7) were the most sensitive parameters in GWQI calculation.
- Groundwater in the southern and southeastern Marvdasht aquifer is hard to very hard and unsuitable for drinking, while the northern area shows good quality.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate groundwater quality the Marvdasht aquifer using the Groundwater Quality Index (GWQI), which was determined using a conventional method and also predicted using three machine learning algorithms: Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF). For this purpose, groundwater quality parameters (pH, EC, TDS, TH, Na⁺, Ca 2 ⁺, Mg 2 ⁺, Cl⁻, HCO₃⁻, SO₄ 2 ⁻, and K⁺) were measured. The GWQI was calculated based on WHO drinking-water standards, and a spatial map was generated in ArcGIS. Results showed that TDS, EC, Na⁺, Cl⁻, and Mg 2 ⁺ were the most influential parameters controlling groundwater quality. The groundwater quality was classified as hard to very hard and not suitable for drinking purposes in the southern and southeastern areas of the study site, while the northern area showed good quality due to limestone formations and recharge from a dam. Results also revealed that Na–Cl was the dominant water type, which indicates the groundwater evolution through rock–water interaction, dissolution, and evaporation. TDS mean variation index of 27.8 and EC with mean variation index of 15.7 were selected as the most sensitive quality parameters in GWQI calculation. Among the applied models, the ANN provided the highest accuracy (R 2 = 0.999; RMSE = 1.02), followed by SVM and RF for predicting GWQI from groundwater quality parameters. It was concluded that the integration of GWQI, ANN, and GIS effectively captured spatial variations and provided a reliable framework for groundwater monitoring in arid regions.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Geochemistry and PetrologyEarth and Planetary Sciences