PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New Political Economy· 2026Q1

Deflected disruption: payments and the taming of Chinese fintech

Colin Chia, Jingding Wang

Short summary

Chinese state authorities deflected fintech disruption by leveraging their control over intermediation and informational power, shifting from accommodation to restriction when fintechs threatened these core interests.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • State authorities manage fintech disruption by controlling intermediation and informational power.
  • Accommodation of fintech occurs when it aligns with economic modernization goals.
  • Restriction of fintech intensifies when it compromises state intermediary positions and informational power.
  • States can deflect fintech disruption towards their own objectives, even if they cannot fully stop it.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Why and how do state authorities seek to deflect and harness technological disruption? Under what conditions do they shift between welcoming disruptive innovation as a driver of economic modernisation and seeing it as a threat to political and financial stability? We examine these questions in the context of how authorities handled the emergence of payments systems attached to digital platform companies within mainland China, where Ant Group and Tencent are used by over 1 billion people, and their international expansion to Southeast Asia. We argue that intermediation and the informational power derived from it are central to the political economy of Fintech disruption. Authorities and banking incumbents were accommodating of disruption to the extent it aligned with goals of increasing economic modernisation and efficiency. However, they were less tolerant of Fintech disruption that compromised their intermediary positions and informational power, and acted more strongly to deflect or block it. Similarly, Chinese fintechs in Southeast Asia have been limited by intense competition in target markets, as states in the region manage potential disruption of their international monetary orders. States are able to deflect the trajectory of Fintech disruption towards their own objectives, even if they cannot entirely stop or determine it.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New Political Economy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Management Information SystemsBusiness, Management and Accounting