PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology· 2018Q1

Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation

Julio Pascual, Stefan P. Berger, Oliver Witzke, Hélio Tedesco‐Silva et al.

Short summary

Everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure was noninferior to mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard CNI exposure in kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, failing to meet the primary composite endpoint of acute rejection or poor graft function (48.2% vs 45.1%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Everolimus with reduced CNI was noninferior to MPA with standard CNI in a composite endpoint of acute rejection or poor graft function (48.2% vs 45.1%) in kidney transplant recipients.
  • The study included 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients in a multicenter noninferiority trial.
  • Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (3.6% vs 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% vs 8.0%) was lower in the everolimus arm.
  • 23.0% of patients in the everolimus arm discontinued study drug due to adverse events, compared to 11.9% in the MPA arm.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background Everolimus permits reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, but the efficacy and safety outcomes of this treatment after kidney transplant require confirmation. Methods In a multicenter noninferiority trial, we randomized 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients to receive, in combination with induction therapy and corticosteroids, everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (everolimus arm) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (MPA arm). The primary end point was treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or eGFR<50 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 at post-transplant month 12 using a 10% noninferiority margin. Results In the intent-to-treat population (everolimus n =1022, MPA n =1015), the primary end point incidence was 48.2% (493) with everolimus and 45.1% (457) with MPA (difference 3.2%; 95% confidence interval, −1.3% to 7.6%). Similar between-treatment differences in incidence were observed in the subgroups of patients who received tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death at post-transplant month 12 occurred in 14.9% and 12.5% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively (difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, −1.7% to 6.4%). De novo donor-specific antibody incidence at 12 months and antibody-mediated rejection rate did not differ between arms. Cytomegalovirus (3.6% versus 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% versus 8.0%) were less frequent in the everolimus arm than in the MPA arm. Overall, 23.0% and 11.9% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively, discontinued the study drug because of adverse events. Conclusions In kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, everolimus was noninferior to MPA for a binary composite end point assessing immunosuppressive efficacy and preservation of graft function.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Transplantation

TransplantationMedicine