PofoliaShared via Pofolia

American Journal of Transplantation· 2012Q1

Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies in a Cohort Comparing Everolimus With Cyclosporine After Kidney Transplantation

Lutz Liefeldt, Susanne Brakemeier, Petra Glander, Johannes Waiser et al.

Short summary

Everolimus-based immunosuppression increased the risk of developing donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) by 2.1 times compared to cyclosporine in kidney transplant patients (23.0% vs. 10.8%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 23.0% of kidney transplant patients on everolimus developed DSA vs. 10.8% on cyclosporine (p=0.048).
  • AMR occurred in 8 patients on everolimus vs. 2 on cyclosporine (p=0.036).
  • Graft loss occurred in 4/10 patients with AMR, all in the everolimus group.
  • Everolimus, >3 HLA mismatches, and living donor were significant risk factors for DSA and AMR.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have a negative impact on kidney graft survival. Therefore, we analyzed the occurrence of DSA and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in patients from two prospective randomized trials in our center. At 3–4.5 months posttransplant 127 patients were randomized to continue cyclosporine or converted to everolimus therapy. The presence of DSA was prospectively assessed using Luminex assays. AMR was defined according to the Banff 2009 classification. Antibody screening was available in 126 patients with a median follow-up of 1059 days. Seven out of 65 (10.8%) patients on cyclosporine developed DSA after a median of 991 days. In comparison, 14/61 patients (23.0%) randomized to everolimus developed DSA after 551 days (log-rank: p = 0.048). Eight patients on everolimus compared to two patients on cyclosporine developed AMR (log-rank: p = 0.036). Four of 10 patients with AMR—all in the everolimus group—lost their graft. A multivariate regression model revealed everolimus, >3 mismatches and living donor as significant risk factors for DSA. Acute rejection within the first year, >3 mismatches, everolimus and living donor were independent risk factors for AMR. This single center analysis demonstrates for the first time that everolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk for the development of DSA and AMR. Donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have a negative impact on kidney graft survival. Therefore, we analyzed the occurrence of DSA and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in patients from two prospective randomized trials in our center. At 3–4.5 months posttransplant 127 patients were randomized to continue cyclosporine or converted to everolimus therapy. The presence of DSA was prospectively assessed using Luminex assays. AMR was defined according to the Banff 2009 classification. Antibody screening was available in 126 patients with a median follow-up of 1059 days. Seven out of 65 (10.8%) patients on cyclosporine developed DSA after a median of 991 days. In comparison, 14/61 patients (23.0%) randomized to everolimus developed DSA after 551 days (log-rank: p = 0.048). Eight patients on everolimus compared to two patients on cyclosporine developed AMR (log-rank: p = 0.036). Four of 10 patients with AMR—all in the everolimus group—lost their graft. A multivariate regression model revealed everolimus, >3 mismatches and living donor as significant risk factors for DSA. Acute rejection within the first year, >3 mismatches, everolimus and living donor were independent risk factors for AMR. This single center analysis demonstrates for the first time that everolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk for the development of DSA and AMR.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. American Journal of Transplantation, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Transplantation

TransplantationMedicine