PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Social Sciences & Humanities Open· 2026Q1

Sarcasm as a character creation tool in literary works: A pragmatic approach through Norman's unique use of language in On Golden Pond

Bora Arga, Gürkan Doğan

Short summary

Norman Thayer Jr. in 'On Golden Pond' uses sarcasm not just as a defense, but as a deliberate tool to create character, forcing audiences and other characters to infer his hostility through 'entertaining impoliteness'.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Norman's sarcasm in 'On Golden Pond' is a deliberate character creation tool, not just a defense mechanism.
  • The analysis combines Relevance Theory (echoic use) and Impoliteness Theory to explain Norman's communication.
  • Norman's dialogue forces interlocutors into cognitive traps requiring significant inferential effort.
  • His interpersonal aggression serves as 'entertaining impoliteness' for the audience.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article investigates the function of sarcasm as a sophisticated tool for character creation in cinematic narratives, using the character of Norman Thayer Jr. in On Golden Pond as a case study. Moving beyond classical Gricean models, this study adopts an integrated pragmatic stylistic framework that combines Relevance Theory (RT) with Impoliteness Theory and the study of telecinematic discourse. By examining emblematic excerpts from the film's dialogue, the analysis demonstrates how Norman's acerbic wit operates not merely as a psychological defence mechanism but as a calculated series of intentional face-attacks. Through RT's concept of echoic use and Bousfield's (2008) impoliteness framework, the article explains how Norman forces his interlocutors into cognitive traps, demanding significant inferential work to decode his hostility. Furthermore, situating these interactions within the realm of telecinematic discourse reveals that Norman's interpersonal aggression simultaneously functions as “entertaining impoliteness” for the overhearing audience (Simpson, 2003). Ultimately, this research illuminates the structural and cognitive artistry behind complex character portrayal, offering a systematic paradigm for analysing sarcasm as a narrative engine in screen discourse.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyPsychology