PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Agrarian Change· 2026Q1

Satire and Silence Under Authoritarian Rule: Cotton and Pesticide Perceptions in Tajikistan

Irna Hofman, Flora Roberts

Short summary

Graphic satire in Tajikistan reveals shifting, often censored, perceptions of pesticide use in cotton farming, moving from positive portrayals in early Soviet times to ambivalence and eventual silence in contemporary Tajikistan.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Graphic satire in Tajikistan shows evolving attitudes towards pesticides in cotton farming over 70 years.
  • Early Soviet-era satire presented pesticides positively, shifting to ambivalence and then sporadic, bleaker coverage.
  • Contemporary Tajikistan exhibits a notable silence on pesticides in satire and public debate.
  • Censorship has been a constant factor influencing pesticide representation.
  • The study uses satire as a method to analyze the politics of the global pesticide complex.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past 70 years, agricultural chemicals have become a mainstay of cotton farming in Central Asia. This growing reliance on agrochemicals has not remained uncontested. This article analyses the politics of pesticides in Soviet and post‐Soviet Tajikistan by examining how, and to what extent, pesticides have featured in graphic satire, an important vehicle for contention and social critique, across the caesura caused by the break‐up of the Soviet Union. Whereas pesticides were presented positively in the early‐postwar years, coverage became more ambivalent between the mid‐1960s and mid‐1970s, becoming bleaker and more sporadic in the 1980s. In contemporary Tajikistan, pesticides do not feature prominently in satire nor in public debates. Waxing and waning attention to pesticides reflects distinct sociopolitical and socioeconomic changes—with censorship a constant. Covertly expressed disquiet over pesticide use in the Soviet era, and the salient silence about agrochemicals in contemporary Tajikistan, may explain the continuity in chemical‐intensive farming practices, but do not imply society's consent or compliance. By focusing on the “repertoire of contention” of pesticide use, we offer an original method to unpack the political dimension of the global pesticide complex.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

General Agricultural and Biological SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences