Cognitive Development· 2026Q2
Understanding learner engagement in AI-mediated language learning: Growth mindset, resilience, self-efficacy, and AI-use behavior profiles
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Learner engagement in AI-mediated language learning is positively associated with growth mindset, resilience, and self-efficacy, with self-efficacy mediating these relationships. Three distinct AI-use behavior profiles emerged: Low, Moderate, and High.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Growth mindset and resilience are positively linked to self-efficacy and learner engagement in AI-driven language learning.
- Self-efficacy statistically mediates the influence of growth mindset and resilience on learner engagement.
- Three AI-use behavior profiles were identified: Low, Moderate, and High, based on AI-use frequency, revision cycles, revision depth, and feedback types.
- Chinese language learners showed a stronger growth mindset-engagement link, while English learners had a stronger resilience-self-efficacy link.
- Qualitative data illustrate diverse learner interpretations and uses of AI-generated feedback.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study examined the relationships among growth mindset, resilience, self-efficacy, and learner engagement in AI-mediated language learning, while exploring variation in learners’ reported AI-use behaviors and experiences of AI-generated feedback. Drawing on survey data from 625 Malaysian undergraduates and follow-up interviews with 24 participants, the study employed structural equation modeling, latent profile analysis, and reflexive thematic analysis. The findings indicated positive associations of growth mindset and resilience with self-efficacy and learner engagement. Self-efficacy was positively associated with learner engagement and statistically mediated the associations of growth mindset and resilience with engagement. Latent profile analysis identified three patterns of reported AI-use behavior: Low AI-Use Behavior, Moderate AI-Use Behavior, and High AI-Use Behavior, based on AI-use frequency, revision cycles, revision depth, and feedback types used. Multigroup analyses indicated broadly comparable motivational relationships among Chinese and English language learners, although the growth mindset–engagement association was stronger among Chinese learners, while the resilience–self-efficacy association was stronger among English learners. The qualitative findings illustrated how participants representing the three profiles described interpreting, evaluating, and incorporating AI-generated feedback during language-learning activities. Participants’ accounts also reflected variation in how they assessed feedback, applied it in subsequent learning activities, and perceived the demands of AI-supported learning. These accounts provide contextual insight into learners’ experiences of AI-generated feedback without suggesting that profile membership determines such experiences. Overall, the findings indicate that self-efficacy was positively associated with engagement in the AI-mediated learning context examined, alongside heterogeneity in learners’ reported AI-use behaviors and experiences with AI-generated feedback.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cognitive Development, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Language and Linguistics
Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities