PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The British Journal for the History of Science· 2026Q1

The Red Thaw: Soviet climate science and the politics of global warming, 1950s–1991

Katja Doose

Short summary

Soviet climate scientists actively contributed to global warming discussions from the 1950s, interpreting warming as compatible with socialist planning and potential economic benefit, rather than an environmental crisis.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Soviet scientists were early contributors to anthropogenic climate change analysis from the 1950s.
  • Warming was interpreted in the USSR as compatible with long-term planning and potential economic benefits.
  • Soviet climate knowledge circulated between domestic and international arenas, shaped by state priorities.
  • The Soviet case demonstrates that political inaction on climate can stem from institutional interpretation, not just ignorance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how climate science developed in the Soviet Union from the 1950s to the early 1990s as a field shaped both by international scientific exchange and by the political priorities of the Soviet state. Focusing on the climatologist Mikhail Budyko and his research group at the State Hydrological Institute in Leningrad, it shows how Soviet scientists participated actively in emerging international discussions of anthropogenic climate change while working within institutions shaped by the priorities of socialist planning. Soviet climatologists were among the early contributors to the scientific analysis of global warming, yet they often interpreted its implications differently from their Western counterparts. In the USSR, warming was understood less as an environmental crisis than as a process compatible with long-term planning, technological intervention and, in some regions, potential economic benefit. Drawing on archival materials and interviews, the article traces how climate knowledge circulated between domestic and international scientific arenas while remaining shaped by the political culture of the late Soviet state. The Soviet case challenges narratives that explain political inaction on climate primarily through ignorance or denial, showing instead how the political significance of climate knowledge depended on the institutional frameworks through which it was interpreted and mobilized.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The British Journal for the History of Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Political Science and International Relations

Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences