Minerva· 2026Q1
The Council for Science and Society and the Politics of Expertise, 1972–1990
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
The Council for Science and Society (CSS), active in Britain from 1973-1990, produced expert-led reports on technoscientific issues like risk management and genetic testing.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The Council for Science and Society (CSS) was established in Britain in 1973 to address social consequences of science and technology.
- The CSS produced expert reports on topics including risk management, non-lethal weapons, and in-vitro genetic testing.
- The organization operated during the 1970s and 1980s, a period of major transformations in British society and science funding.
- The CSS maintained an "uneasy position," challenging technocratic authority while seeking its support.
- This article aims to bring the CSS, which has received little scholarly attention, into broader historical discussions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract This article examines the origins and operations of the Council for Science and Society (CSS), active in Britain between 1973 and 1990. Established in response to growing concerns about the social consequences of science and technology, the CSS sought to map emerging technoscientific issues through carefully constructed, expert-led reports on a range of topics, including the management of risk in large-scale technoscientific projects, the use of non-lethal weapons in policing, and the ethics of in-vitro genetic testing. The CSS unfolded against the backdrop of broader transformations in British society during the 1970s and 1980s. Changes in government funding for science, a series of industrial crises, and debates about the role of science in the Cold War informed much of the work the CSS undertook. Throughout its existence, the CSS often occupied an uneasy position, attempting to interrogate technocratic authority while continuing to lobby for its support. The trajectory of the CSS also intersected with the British Radical Science Movement, or the largely scientist-led effort that emerged in the late 1960s to challenge claims of scientific neutrality. Although the two overlapped in membership and problem selection, they pursued distinct strategies and political imaginaries. Despite its proximity to British policymakers and the British Radical Science Movement, the CSS has received virtually no sustained scholarly attention. This article thus aims to bring the CSS back into view, situating it within broader histories of British science, democratic state governance, and the contested terrain of technoscientific critique.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Minerva, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: History and Philosophy of Science
History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities