PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Hispanic American Historical Review· 2026Q1

The Resilience of Peruvian Viceregal Patronage: Governance, Corregimientos , and Corruption Under Melchor de Navarra, 1681–1689

Rubén Gálvez Martín

Short summary

Contrary to the thesis of declining viceregal patronage in the late 17th century Spanish monarchy, the rule of Viceroy Melchor de Navarra in Peru (1681-1689) shows patronage becoming hegemonic and a primary channel for illicit gain.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Viceroy Melchor de Navarra's rule (1681-1689) in Peru saw patronage become hegemonic, not decline.
  • The provision of corregimientos was a key instrument for political management and illicit gain.
  • Patronage served as a channel for personal enrichment for Navarra and his inner circle.
  • The study reconstructs this sphere of business with exceptional breadth and contextual depth using administrative and notarial sources.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on the case of Melchor de Navarra, viceroy of Peru from 1681 to 1689, this article qualifies the thesis that viceregal patronage in the Spanish monarchy declined in the late seventeenth century. The instruments that Navarra employed for political management—particularly the provision of corregimientos—reveal that, under his rule, patronage did not recede: It became almost hegemonic and served as a channel of illicit gain for him and his circles. This conclusion rests on a relational approach and on the cross-reading of administrative and notarial sources in Spain and Peru, which make it possible to reconstruct this sphere of business with a breadth and contextual depth not previously achieved. The study sheds light on the exercise, negotiation, and legitimation of power, and on the blurred boundaries between public service and private gain in the early modern Hispanic world.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Hispanic American Historical Review, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Visual Arts and Performing ArtsArts and Humanities