PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Rhinology Journal· 2017Q1

Position paper on olfactory dysfunction

Thomas Hummel, Katherine L. Whitcroft, Peter Andrews, Aytuğ Altundağ et al.

Short summary

This position paper proposes standardized methodologies for assessing olfactory dysfunction to improve research quality and treatment development, addressing the current heterogeneity in definitions and assessment techniques.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Standardized assessment should include head and neck examination with nasal endoscopy.
  • Subjective olfactory assessment alone is unreliable and should be supplemented.
  • Validated psychophysical tests for odour threshold, identification, or discrimination are recommended.
  • Comprehensive chemosensory assessment should incorporate gustatory screening.
  • Smell training may benefit patients with olfactory loss across various causes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction is an increasingly recognised condition, associated with reduced quality of life and major health outcomes such as neurodegeneration and death. However, translational research in this field is limited by heterogeneity in methodological approach, including definitions of impairment, improvement and appropriate assessment techniques. Accordingly, effective treatments for smell loss are limited. In an effort to encourage high quality and comparable work in this field, among others, we propose the following ideas and recommendations. Whilst the full set of recommendations are outlined in the main document, points include the following: - Patients with suspected olfactory loss should undergo a full examination of the head and neck, including rigid nasal endoscopy with small diameter endoscopes. - Subjective olfactory assessment should not be undertaken in isolation, given its poor reliability. - Psychophysical assessment tools used in clinical and research settings should include reliable and validated tests of odour threshold, and/or one of odour identification or discrimination. - Comprehensive chemosensory assessment should include gustatory screening. - Smell training can be helpful in patients with olfactory loss of several aetiologies. CONCLUSIONS: We hope the current manuscript will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency and generalisability of work in this field.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Rhinology Journal, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Sensory Systems

Sensory SystemsNeuroscience