PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Operations Research Forum· 2026Q2

Threshold-Safe Shock Absorption in a Compartmental Voter-Flow Model: A Conservative Impulse-Control Benchmark

Alexander V. Omelchenko

Short summary

A new benchmark for threshold-safe staging of external loads in a voter-flow model demonstrates that a simple scalar leaky reservoir can act as a conservative envelope for complex two-dimensional dynamics, providing closed-form safety certificates.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A benchmark is formulated for threshold-safe staging of external loads in a compartmental voter-flow model.
  • The model uses state variables A(t) (effective stock) and S(t) (mobilisation intensity).
  • A stability threshold Δc exists: below it, mobilization contracts; above it, transient amplification is possible.
  • A scalar leaky reservoir model is shown to be a conservative envelope of the full two-dimensional dynamics.
  • Schedules below Δc in the scalar model provide a sufficient safety certificate for the nonlinear system.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract We formulate an analytical, non-calibrated benchmark for threshold-safe staging of a fixed external load in a reduced compartmental voter-flow model. The state $$A(t)$$ A ( t ) is an effective stock of stress, backlog, or alienation, and $$S(t)$$ S ( t ) is a local mobilisation intensity near the mainstream baseline. The term “safe” refers only to local non-amplification of $$S$$ S , not to a normative or empirical assessment of a political system. Near the baseline, the nonlinear dynamics have a local stability threshold $$\Delta _c$$ Δ c : below it mobilisation contracts, whereas above it transient amplification is possible. The main contribution is a comparison theorem showing that a scalar leaky reservoir is a conservative envelope of the full two-dimensional dynamics. Consequently, a schedule that remains below $$\Delta _c$$ Δ c in the scalar model is a sufficient, but not necessary, safety certificate for the nonlinear system. The affine use of $$A$$ A outside the local simplex is explicitly treated as an effective stress-coordinate assumption. The envelope yields closed-form benchmarks for single-release exposure, complete-relaxation splitting with fixed per-release overhead, the finite-recovery constant-peak profile, and the fixed-horizon safe-capacity supremum $$\Delta _c(1+\rho T)$$ Δ c ( 1 + ρ T ) , which is not attained by any finite schedule at equality. The scalar formulas are classical; their role here is to make a stability-derived threshold mechanism analytically transparent.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Operations Research Forum, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Modeling and Simulation

Modeling and SimulationMathematics