PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of European Public Policy· 2026Q1

Attributes, abstractions, and combinations: a new taxonomy for studying how parties invoke social groups

Hauke Licht, Leonce Röth

Short summary

A novel attribute-centered taxonomy classifies social group references by invoked attributes, their abstraction levels, and combinations, enabling quantitative analysis of party strategies across 36 countries over 50+ years.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Proposes a novel attribute-centered taxonomy for social group references in political discourse.
  • Classifies groups by invoked attributes, nested levels of abstraction, and attribute combinations.
  • Demonstrates the taxonomy's value by quantifying party group focus strategies in 36 countries over 50+ years.
  • Reveals how socio-structural, constructivist, and deservingness perspectives operate at different analytical levels.
  • Provides data and automated classifiers to support future research on political discourse.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Research increasingly examines which social groups political actors refer to. Yet, existing approaches typically inherit classifications shaped by demand-side perspectives or conflate how groups are defined with how they are framed. We propose a novel, attribute-centered taxonomy of social group references that classifies groups by the attributes political actors invoke, organizes these attributes along nested levels of abstraction, and captures attribute combinations when multiple attributes are invoked within a single reference. To demonstrate the analytical value of our taxonomy, we collect original annotations and develop automated classification methods to quantify the group focus strategies of parties in 36 countries over more than 50 years. Our application underscores that socio-structural, constructivist, and deservingness perspectives on party competition primarily operate at different – though overlapping – analytical levels, and yields substantive insights into how different party families construct and mobilize social groups. Our taxonomy, data, and pre-trained classifiers contribute new resources to facilitate future research on social group references in political discourse.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of European Public Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Political Science and International Relations

Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences