PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Psychology· 2019Q1· Review

Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis

Piotr Sorokowski, Maciej Karwowski, Michał Misiak, Michalina Marczak et al.

Short summary

Women generally outperform men in olfactory abilities across identification, discrimination, and threshold, according to a meta-analysis of 8,848 participants (5,065 women, 3,783 men).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Women generally outperform men in olfactory identification, discrimination, and threshold.
  • The meta-analysis included data from 8,848 participants for olfactory threshold, 8,067 for discrimination, 13,670 for identification (using Sniffin Sticks Test), and 7,154 for identification (using UPSIT).
  • Effect sizes for the observed sex differences were weak, ranging from g = 0.08 to g = 0.30.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Although the view that women's olfactory abilities outperform men's is taken for granted, some studies involving large samples suggested that male and female olfactory abilities are actually similar. To address this discrepancy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies on olfaction, targeting possible sex differences. The analyzed sample comprised n = 8 848 (5 065 women and 3 783 men) for olfactory threshold (as measured with the Sniffin Sticks Test; SST), n = 8 067 (4 496 women and 3 571 men) for discrimination (SST), n = 13 670 (7 501 women and 6 169 men) for identification (SST), and a total sample of n = 7 154 (3 866 women and 3 288 men) for works using University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). We conducted separate meta-analyses for each aspect of olfaction: identification, discrimination and threshold. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that women generally outperform men in olfactory abilities. What is more, they do so in every aspect of olfaction analyzed in the current study. However, the effect sizes were weak and ranged between g = 0.08 and g = 0.30. We discuss our findings in the context of factors that potentially shape sex differences in olfaction. Nevertheless, although our findings seem to confirm the “common knowledge” on female olfactory superiority, it needs to be emphasized that the effect sizes we observed were notably small.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Sensory Systems

Sensory SystemsNeuroscience