Calcified Tissue International· 2026Q1
Fracture Risk Stratification by REMS: A 5 Years Prospective Longitudinal Multicentre Study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A 5-year prospective study of 4017 women shows that integrating bone quantity (REMS T-score) and skeletal fragility (Fragility Score) via REMS risk stratification effectively identifies distinct fracture risk profiles, with low-risk classes showing reduced fracture probability and high-risk classes showing markedly increased risk.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- REMS fracture risk stratification, combining bone quantity and fragility, effectively differentiates fracture susceptibility.
- A strong positive monotonic trend (p < 0.0001) was observed in the distribution of fractured patients across 7 REMS risk classes at lumbar spine and femoral neck.
- Low-risk REMS classes significantly reduced fracture probability, while high-risk classes markedly increased it.
- The 5-year longitudinal data support the clinical consistency of REMS for integrated fracture risk assessment.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by low bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture. Current predictive tools, mainly based on DXA-BMD, do not full capture all the factors contributing to bone deterioration. By combining information on bone quantity (T-score) and skeletal fragility (Fragility Score, FS), the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry provides an integrated measure of fracture susceptibility known as fracture risk stratification. We aimed To evaluate the ability of REMS fracture risk stratification through a 5 years prospective longitudinal multicentre study. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to assess differences of REMS T-score and FS between fractured and non-fractured patients. Additionally, Chi-squared tests, Cochran-Armitage trend tests, class-specific unadjusted logistic regressions and standardized residual analyses were performed to evaluate the proposed stratification model. A total of 4443 female patients was recruited and n = 4017 underwent REMS scans. The Chi-squared and the Cochran-Armitage trend tests showed that the distribution of fractured patients differed across the 7 risk classes with a strong positive monotonic trend at lumbar spine (Z = 47.83; p < 0.0001) and femoral neck (Z = 75.41; p < 0.0001). From a clinical perspective, both Class-specific binary logistic regression and standardized residuals clearly identified two opposite risk profiles: patients belonging to the low-risk classes exhibited a significantly reduced probability of fracture, whereas those in the high-risk classes showed a markedly increased fracture risk. This 5-year longitudinal study supports the clinical consistency of a REMS composite approach for fracture risk stratification based on the integration of REMS BMD T-score and Fragility Score.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Calcified Tissue International, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Orthopedics and Sports MedicineMedicine