PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology· 2026Q1

Acute Effects of High- Versus Low-Elevation-Gain Trail Running Training on Static and Dynamic Postural Balance in Young Trail Runners

Carlos Castellar Otín, Abraham Blánquez, Alejandro García-Giménez, Miguel Lecina

Short summary

Trail running training with 1000m elevation gain acutely worsened static balance by 3.33 BESS errors compared to 1.20 errors after flat training in young athletes (n=15).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Acute trail running with 1000m elevation gain increased BESS errors by 3.33, while flat training (15m) increased errors by 1.20.
  • Static balance (BESS) was significantly more affected by elevation gain post-session (15.67 ± 1.23 errors) compared to flat sessions (12.67 ± 1.23 errors).
  • Dynamic balance (YBT composite index) showed no significant differences between high-elevation and flat training sessions.
  • Fifteen highly trained young trail runners (age 16.8 ± 2.14 years) participated in the study.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background: Trail running is a sport characterized by taking place in natural environments and requiring constant adaptation to irregular terrain, making postural balance crucial for preventing falls and coping with the coordinative demands of these races. Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the acute effects of elevation on dynamic and static balance in young trained trail runners. Methods: Fifteen highly trained young athletes (eight females, seven males; age 16.8 ± 2.14 years) completed two similar training sessions except for elevation gain (1000 m vs. 15 m, flat). Static balance was evaluated using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and dynamic balance was assessed with the Y Balance Test (YBT) before (pre) and after each session (post) using 2 × 2 (Time × Terrain) repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: BESS errors increased in both sessions but more after elevation (+3.33 vs. +1.20 errors; interaction p < 0.001; post-session 15.67 ± 1.23 vs. 12.67 ± 1.23). The YBT composite index showed no significant differences between elevation and flat sessions (83.32 ± 7.92 vs. 83.79 ± 7.59, p = 0.763) or in the interaction (p = 0.057). Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for specific strategies to preserve postural balance—especially static balance—during training and after trail races and support taking elevation gain into account when programming training load in young trail runners.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationHealth Professions