Science & Education· 2026Q1
Amid an Epistemic Iteration: How AI Methodologies May Transform the Nature of Science Education Research
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
AI methodologies can transform science education research by enabling scalable, reproducible, and fine-grained analyses of student learning, potentially marking an epistemic iteration in the field.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- AI methodologies offer scalable, reproducible, and fine-grained analyses for science education research.
- A seven-phase framework is proposed to analyze AI's impact on research, from problem framing to refinement.
- AI may advance scientific inquiry in science education research.
- AI methodologies could lead to the prioritization of different epistemic aims, criteria, and practices compared to traditional methods.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) may transform the nature of science (NOS). These transformations may extend to science education research, where AI methodologies increasingly enable scalable, reproducible, and fine‑grained analyses of student learning. To reflect on potential transformations that AI methodologies may bring to science education research, we draw on Hasok Chang’s notion of epistemic iteration , in which successive stages of knowledge build iteratively on one another to achieve specific epistemic aims. Anchored in this notion, and further illustrated by the historical development of thermometers, this article proposes and applies a framework for reflecting on how AI methodologies may transform the nature of science education research. The framework comprises seven phases: (1) problem framing, (2) instrumentation and measurement, (3) experimentation and evidence‑based inference, (4) comparisons and replication, (5) building norms and consensus, (6) implementation and its consequences, and (7) continuous refinement. For each phase, we analyze how AI methodologies may transform the nature of science education research and draw parallels to historical explorations of temperature. Our analysis suggests that the field may currently be amid an epistemic iteration, in which AI methodologies may advance scientific inquiry within the field. Simultaneously, AI methodologies may contribute to prioritizing different epistemic aims, epistemic criteria, and epistemic practices compared with traditional methods. By recognizing these potential transformations and drawing on lessons from the history and philosophy of science, we evaluate how AI methodologies may impact how science education research is done to ensure that promising avenues for future research are epistemically well grounded.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Science & Education, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Social Sciences
General Social SciencesSocial Sciences