PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Business Ethics· 2026Q1

Effective Worker Resistance and Realist Ideology Critique

Uğur Aytaç, Ozan Nadir Alakavuklar

Short summary

This paper introduces 'epistemic efficacy' as a new dimension for evaluating worker resistance, defined as the ability to disrupt workplace ideological legitimation and foster egalitarian contestation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Introduces 'epistemic efficacy' as a novel concept for evaluating worker resistance.
  • Defines epistemic efficacy as resistance that reliably disrupts ideological legitimation.
  • Highlights the creation of opportunities for egalitarian and collective contestation as a key aspect of epistemic efficacy.
  • Applies the framework to analyze gossip as a form of workplace resistance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract When do workers have good reasons to endorse a specific resistance strategy against managerial injustice? The answer partly requires clarifying whether that form of resistance is effective. But how should we understand efficacy? Political theorists cannot simply refer this question to empirical researchers. There is conceptual unclarity on what counts as efficacy. This paper shows that efficacy is a complex concept with multiple politically relevant dimensions. We illustrate this complexity by developing an epistemic notion of efficacy through a method of ideology critique, articulating a distinct dimension of effective resistance. A practice of resistance is epistemically efficacious if it reliably disrupts the mechanisms of ideological legitimation in the workplace by creating opportunities for egalitarian and collective contestation. Epistemic efficacy is a distinct evaluative lens that can assess the effectiveness of a resistance practice. After presenting the main argument, we apply our framework to the case of gossip as workplace resistance.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Business Ethics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Information Systems and Management

Information Systems and ManagementDecision Sciences