PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering· 2026Q1

Relational seas, bounded lands: reframing maritime space in the Spice Islands of eastern Indonesia

Yulia Nurliani Lukito, Mohammad Nanda Widyarta

Short summary

Pre-colonial Eastern Indonesia was organized by sea-based spatial logic and fluid networks of alliance, not fixed territories, a system reconfigured by colonial imposition of territorial control.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Pre-colonial Eastern Indonesia was structured by a sea-oriented spatial logic emphasizing mobility and exchange.
  • Power operated through fluid networks of alliance and tribute, not fixed territorial boundaries.
  • Colonial powers imposed a territorial logic using cartography, infrastructure, and administrative control.
  • Colonial interventions transformed dynamic maritime worlds into fixed, governable units.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article reconceptualizes the spatial history of the Indonesian archipelago by foregrounding the tension between indigenous maritime spatialities and colonial territorial regimes. It argues that pre-colonial Eastern Indonesia was structured through a sea-oriented spatial logic in which mobility, exchange, and diplomacy constituted authority. Rather than bounded territories, power operated through fluid networks of alliance, tribute, and ritual, approximating a maritime adaptation of the mandala polity. This relational order was progressively reconfigured through colonial intervention, as European powers imposed a territorial logic grounded in cartography, infrastructure intervention, and administrative control. Colonial spatial practices – ranging from the delineation of fortified enclaves to the codification of spice-producing zones – transformed dynamic maritime worlds into fixed and governable units. These interventions not only restructured political authority but also materialized new spatial orders through infrastructure and space reorganization. By bridging critical spatial theory and built form, this study demonstrates that the making of Indonesia’s spatial order was not a linear transition toward modern territoriality, but a contested process shaped by the interaction between enduring indigenous spatial systems and imposed colonial frameworks.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Anthropology

AnthropologySocial Sciences