Frontiers in Sociology· 2026Q1
Language attitudes and ethnic or cultural identity among ethnic minority university students in China: a systematic bilingual knowledge synthesis
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A systematic review of 23 studies found a recurring association between language evaluation and ethnic/cultural identity among ethnic minority university students in China, but the direction, magnitude, and causal order remain unresolved.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A recurring association exists between language evaluation and ethnic/cultural identity in Chinese minority university students.
- Direct evidence confirms this association, but direction, magnitude, and causality are unresolved.
- Heritage language attachment can coexist with the instrumental value of Putonghua and English.
- Opportunities for language use and recognition may explain variations in practice.
- Limited comparability across studies hinders cumulative knowledge.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Research on ethnic minority university students in China frequently links language attitudes with ethnic or cultural identity, but its findings are difficult to accumulate because studies operationalize different constructs and answer different questions. This systematic bilingual knowledge synthesis examined what the evidence collectively establishes and which explanations remain provisional. Searches of Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) yielded 303 records; 25 reports (individual publications) representing 23 distinct studies (underlying empirical investigations or datasets) were included. Seven reports representing six studies supplied direct evidence, while 18 reports representing 17 studies supplied contextual evidence. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and appraised the included studies using the 2018 Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Direct evidence showed a recurring association between language evaluation and ethnic or cultural identity, while direction, common magnitude, and causal ordering remain unresolved. Contextual evidence showed that heritage-language attachment can coexist with the instrumental value of Putonghua and English and identified opportunities for use and recognition as plausible explanations for variation in practice. The focal conclusion remained supported when it was based only on the six studies classified as direct evidence; contextual findings were not counted as confirmation. The review identifies a shortage of direct tests and limited comparability across constructs, designs, reports, and evidence roles as the main barriers to cumulative knowledge.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Sociology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Linguistics and Language
Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences