PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Education Sciences· 2026Q1

Enacting Minority Language Rights Through High-Stakes Assessment: Task Design in the Slovene-Language First Written Paper of Italy’s School-Leaving Examination

Maja Melinc Mlekuž

Short summary

Italy's school-leaving exam task design for Slovene-language papers institutionalizes minority language rights by requiring its use for literary interpretation, historical reasoning, source-based argumentation, and public-discourse writing.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Italy's school-leaving exam task design for Slovene-language papers requires the use of Slovene for literary interpretation, historical reasoning, source-based argumentation, and public-discourse writing.
  • The examination architecture includes literary interpretation (Type A), source-based reasoning (Type B), and autonomous critical writing (Type C).
  • Eight options address border- or minority-related content, with nine having documented Italian-language counterparts.
  • Candidates can choose from seven options, making engagement with Slovene literature and minority-specific content available but not compulsory.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

National school-leaving examinations do more than certify attainment: through task design, they define which forms of literacy, knowledge, and judgement receive institutional recognition. This study examines how Italy’s upper-secondary school-leaving examination is administered in Slovene, a protected minority language, and how task design gives institutional form to minority-language rights. A comparative document analysis covered six regular-session papers from 2019 and 2022–2026, comprising 42 options. Each option was analysed for source material, question sequence, final writing demand, identity positioning, and functions assigned to Slovene. The examination retains a three-type architecture: literary interpretation in Type A, source-based reasoning and argumentation in Type B, and autonomous critical-explanatory writing in Type C. Eight options address border- or minority-related content, six of them in Type B, while nine have a documented Italian-language counterpart. Minority-related content is framed for interpretation, contextualisation, and reasoned judgement without requiring identity affirmation. Candidates select one of seven options, so engagement with Slovene literature and minority-specific content is available but not compulsory. At the level of task design, the examination requires Slovene for literary interpretation, historical reasoning, source-based argumentation, and public-discourse writing, making these functions part of state certification in the protected language.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Education Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences